The Tragic Shooting At Fort Hood.....

[SouthwestRanger]

SR: My Cousin Terri who I last saw at my Dad's Funeral is a Medical Specialist living in the Dallas Area and is currently engaged in taking care of the victims of last weeks tragedy....

WASHINGTON (Reuters) ? A shooting took place at a U.S. Army base in Fort Hood, Texas but it is unclear how many people were injured and how many shooters were involved, an Army official in Washington said.....





Major Malik Nadal Hasan

NEWSLINK

SR: At time of this post, 12 dead and 31 injured. That just doesn't add up with the single shooter with 2 pistols. He would have to be one great shot and he must have had time for multiple reloads.

Just like Columbine where it was deemed impossible for the two "derranged teens" to accomplish all those killings in such a short time and the planted explosives seemed to be quite professionally placed rather than sloppily....

The Associated Press, quoting military officials, said Hasan received a poor performance evaluation at Walter Reed. The officials would reveal no further details, citing the confidentiality of military records.

Medical records on file in Virginia, where Hasan was born and was registered to practice, and Maryland, where he received his medical degree at the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences in Bethesda, revealed no disciplinary actions or formal complaints.

First it says he recieved a poor eval then the Military claims he had no bad paper in his files......

Typical Military Doublespeak and coverup of the truth....

And if he was such a lousy brass ass, Then WHY THE F**k was he promoted ????

The truth will come out...

[SouthwestRanger]

Everything About Nidal Malik Hasan Screams ?Patsy?


Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com
Friday, November 6, 2009



The Empire strikes back ? right when when public support for the occupation of Iraq and Afghanistan sinks to all time lows, an anti-war Islamic extremist with links to suicide bombers goes on a shooting rampage at a U.S. army base, reinvigorating support for the war on terror and demonizing opposition to it as anti-American extremism. The scam would be believable if it wasn?t so perfectly staged.

Without getting into convoluted conspiracy theories about mind control and whatever else, not that they aren?t without merit, the facts we already know about Hasan and his behavior prior to the deadly shootings just screams out ?patsy? and ?set-up? and almost exactly mirrors other terror scams the Empire has run in the past.

Just like the would-be liquid bombers that were supposedly planning on bringing down multiple airliners in August 2006, who were caught on CCTV buying bulk supplies of cake in the very hours before the plot, Hasan?s pre-shooting behavior contradicts completely the idea that he was preparing for a deadly rampage.

Shortly before the massacre, Hasan was caught on camera shopping at the convenience store located on the army base ? laughing and joking. Is this the behavior of a man psychologically readying himself for the high-intensity horror of gunning down dozens of his colleagues, or someone unaware of what was to follow?

We learn that Hasan ?Showed no signs of worry or stress when he stopped at 7-Eleven for his daily breakfast of hash browns, said Jeannie Strickland, the store?s manager.? ? He came in (Thursday) morning just like normal,? she said, ?nothing weird, nothing out of the ordinary.?

CNN feverishly seized upon the CCTV footage and began broadcasting it relentlessly because Hasan is seen wearing Arab garb and Muslim headdress, fitting the carefully pre-arranged stereotype perfectly. (SHOWN ABOVE - SR)

LINK TO ARTICLE

SR: A young kid from my current State, Alan Carroll, a 20-year-old Bridgewater, NJ resident, was shot four times and underwent surgery Thursday night, according to officials with the North Branch Fire Company in Branchburg. Carroll and his stepfather have been members of the volunteer department for several years....

We wish him well

[Secret Six]

Questions Regarding The Fort Hood Massacre

Chuck Baldwin
November 20, 2009

By now, virtually everyone has read and reread the copious news accounts of the terrible shooting a few weeks ago at Fort Hood, Texas. This column will not attempt to add new details to what is already a highly scrutinized tragedy. However, I do want to pose three basic questions that, to me, are extremely glaring and, for the most part, absent from the discussion.

Question 1: Why were the soldiers not armed?

After all, this is a military base; more than that, it is an Army base that emphasizes the training and equipping of frontline, combat-ready soldiers. For the most part, these were not clerks or cooks; these were combat troops. Fort Hood is home to the 1st Cavalry Division (the largest Division in the Army). Troops stationed at Fort Hood have engaged the enemy in virtually every hot theater of war to which American forces have been deployed. In recent conflicts that means Somalia, Bosnia, Kuwait, Iraq, Afghanistan, etc. Without a doubt, these are among America’s bravest and best.

So, how is it that these intensely trained, disciplined, rugged, highly qualified warriors are not allowed to carry their own weapons on base? This makes about as much sense as the policy forbidding airline pilots from carrying their own handguns on board commercial airliners, or teachers not being allowed to carry their own handguns in the classroom. After all, judges are granted the authority to carry their own firearms into the courtroom. If we can trust lawyers, we should be able to trust soldiers, airline pilots, and teachers.

Question 2: If the federal government–including the Department of Homeland Security, the Department of Defense, etc., with billions of dollars worth of technology; tens of thousands of snoops, spooks, and intelligence gatherers; and myriad Patriot Act-type laws–could not protect US soldiers on one of the most tightly secured and heavily guarded military installations in America, how can anyone in the country possibly not break out in cacophonous laughter when politicians tell us we need to surrender more liberties so that they might pass more laws to protect us crummy little peons? Or is it that, because Hasan was a Muslim, the politically correct nincompoops in charge gave him a pass?

Consider: we have learned that the shooter, Major Nidal Malik Hasan, had attempted to make contact with people associated with al Qaeda; that numerous classmates of Hasan had reported his anti-American views, which, according to a column written by Dennis Prager, “included his giving a presentation that justified suicide bombing and telling classmates that Islamic law trumped the U.S. Constitution”; and that Hasan had a long history of pro-Islamic, anti-American activity. All of which begs an answer to the question, How could such an individual not only be allowed in the US military, but also be allowed to advance to the rank of Major?

I think most of my readers have the answer to this question figured out: we have an out-of-control, politically correct federal government that only senses danger from conservatives, libertarians, Christians, pro-lifers, Tea Party protesters, and anti-UN, anti-IRS, pro-Second Amendment activists–and supporters of Ron Paul and Chuck Baldwin, of course. To this politically correct federal leviathan today, anti-American jihadists, militant Black Panthers, or illegal aliens who have committed felonious crimes in Mexico pose no risk to anyone, and must be “understood.”

LINK TO ARTICLE

S6: Face it gang......

George W. never really left the White House cos' Obama is using his playbook.....

Anybody who thinks some of our super-secret "black-ops" DON'T have (and have had for years ) "mind control" (= i.e."psychotronic ) weapons is kidding themselves.

This is NOT to say that the President, or any ELECTED official knows about this stuff. These things, I believe, are run by deep-cover UNACKNOWLEDGED "special access projects" (USAP's)the "secret government" that operates outside of ANY oversight.